OMO-0248 — Sixteen Hundred Teeth
Politics, the State, and Public Life
Sixteen Hundred Teeth
Zacapu and the Third Disappearance
Duration: 24:05 · Reading with an AI-generated voice. Audio in Spanish.
Spotify · Apple Podcasts · Amazon Music · Watch in Spanish on YouTube
Zacapu and the Third Disappearance
Vox sanguinis fratris tui clamat ad me de terra.
Gn 4:10
I. The Sieve
In Zacapu, in Purépecha country, some women have learned to sift the earth. They do it with the gesture their grandmothers reserved for flour: a mesh frame, a patient back-and-forth motion, their gaze fixed on what remains. What the mesh catches is neither bran nor stone. It is splinters of bone that fire has turned gray and brittle, and among them, pieces so small that at first they look like grains of lime. The women say they are teeth. They say they are baby teeth. They say that, since 2021, they have gathered close to sixteen hundred.
None of them chose this occupation. A few years ago they did not know what a chain of custody was, or how to distinguish disturbed soil from earth that had lain still for centuries; today they speak of search grids and genetic profiles with the terrible ease of someone who learned a language because no other was left to her. Each set out to look for someone of her own, and what they find is rarely what they were seeking. They keep sifting because they discovered something the rest of the country has yet to fully acknowledge: if a bone is not your child's, it is someone else's child's.
We should say at once what is known, because in this matter accuracy is the first form of respect. The figure comes from the collective Buscando Cuerpos en Todo México and its founder, Margarita López Pérez, a mother searching for her missing child and a former state legislator, who maintains that the pieces were recovered alongside adult bones and teeth on a property the collective identifies as an incineration site. The Michoacán prosecutor's office replies that it has no record of such a discovery; its deputy prosecutor added that, according to its files, children's remains in the state's graves are scarce or nonexistent. The federal prosecutor's office says that the examinations are still pending and that it has validated neither the number of pieces nor their origin. To date, there is no public forensic dental report stating how many there are, which are human, how many children they might represent, or where they are now. The collective estimates roughly eighty children. That is its estimate, not an expert finding.
Sixteen hundred teeth do not mean sixteen hundred children: each child has twenty primary teeth and loses them over a span of years, and determining the minimum number of individuals is a scientific calculation, not an act of indignation. No one has the right to inflate that figure to move us. Nor does anyone have the right to use its uncertainty as a sedative, because doubt about how many does not dissolve the question of who. And to understand why that question cannot wait, we must first pause over the very object the mesh retained.
II. The Bone Born to Say Goodbye
Of all human remains, the baby tooth is the only one our imagination has never placed in an ossuary. The skull belongs to the memento mori, the femur to the dissecting room, the jaw to archaeology. The baby tooth belongs to the home. It loosens for days beneath the tongue of a child who cannot stop testing it; it falls out one ordinary afternoon, somewhere between fright and pride; it spends a night beneath the pillow and sometimes ends up in a little box where a mother also keeps the hospital bracelet and a curl from the first haircut, an inventory of priceless things that only love knows how to appraise. It is the only bone born to say goodbye, and it says goodbye without dying.
That is why the image of Zacapu wounds us in a particular way. Not because it is macabre, but because it reverses things. What should have fallen out to make room for another tooth would have fallen, if the allegation is confirmed, because there would be no other. The tooth meant for the crooked smile in a school photograph would be called to testify in place of the mouth that held it.
There is a doctrine in that intuition. A child is not an incomplete adult who lacks the years required to be fully deserving; he is a whole human being in a state of dependence. And that dependence—the hand to cross the street, the roof overhead, another person's will deciding for his while his matures—is not a deficiency politics must correct, but a present claim upon our protection. Weakness does not diminish what someone is owed: it increases the debt of those able to protect him.
The catechetical tradition reserved for certain evils an expression the centuries have failed to tame: sins that cry to heaven. Abel's blood, the cry of the oppressed, the voice of the widow and the orphan. It is not that God needs to be informed. It is that some injustices are so contrary to the rightful order that sacred language can represent them only as a cry rising from the earth. But a cry presupposes ears, and the history of Mexico's disappeared is, above all, the history of what happens when those ears are absent.
III. The First Two Disappearances
We say that a child disappears as though we were naming a single instant. In reality, we open a sequence.
First he disappears from sight. The bed remains made, the backpack on the chair, the glass half-drunk; a telephone becomes both promise and torment; a father walks the same street for the eleventh time because perhaps today he will see what he did not see yesterday. The family enters a time that is not ours: we count days; they count calls that never came.
Then the child may die, and one would think evil had reached its deepest point. It has not. The body may be hidden, burned, broken into pieces, mixed with others; it may be found and recovered without method, reduced to an alphanumeric code, forgotten in a drawer without anyone comparing it with the missing-person report a mother filed two hundred kilometers away. According to the Inter-American Commission, more than seventy thousand bodies await a name in the custody of public institutions themselves. They have been found and remain lost. To exhume is not to return: a tooth may be perfectly numbered while the child remains nameless. The first disappearance takes the child from his home; the second takes the identity from what remains of him.
There is a third. But to name it justly, we must first look at something else: the way we look.
IV. The Arithmetic of the Heart
We suppose, with an almost tender naïveté, that compassion obeys arithmetic: if the death of one child shakes us, the deaths of a hundred should shake us a hundred times more. Paul Slovic and his collaborators have demonstrated the opposite. The emotional response does not grow with the number of victims; it levels off, and in some experiments begins to diminish as soon as the number rises from one to two. A child with a name and a photograph fits whole within the imagination; a hundred form a group; a thousand, a statistic. The one has birthdays; the thousands have percentages. The number that should measure the horror ends up serving as our wall against it.
Psychology describes the mechanism; it does not absolve it. Classical philosophy offers here a correction that modern sensibility has forgotten: justice does not ask how much I feel; it asks what I owe. In the old definition Saint Thomas made his own, it is the constant will to give each his due. Will, not emotion; constant, not intermittent. Feeling may awaken the will, but it cannot be its rule, because feeling grows weary and what is owed does not. A child remains a child when our attention has tired of looking at him, and a mother retains her right to the truth even if the algorithm has found something newer to offer us.
If emotion is not enough, there remains the uncomfortable question of what we do with what we know. And we have long had a phrase ready to evade it.
V. Idle Hands
The phrase is brief: I did nothing. It has the rare virtue of serving at once as absolution and confession.
Psychologists know that we judge harm caused by omission less blameworthy than harm caused by action, and that responsibility becomes diluted as witnesses multiply: the stillness of others becomes, for each person, proof that there is no emergency. In this way, without anyone deciding it, a nation's silence is manufactured. The citizen waits for the journalist, the journalist for the prosecutor's office, the prosecutor's office disputes its jurisdiction, the agency waits for an official letter, the foreigner for a response from the country, and the country for a response from abroad. Everyone waits for someone. No one lies. And the silence ends up feeding on its own movement.
The old moralists needed no laboratories to know this. Saint Thomas, listing those who cooperate in harm to another, does not stop at those who command, advise, or participate: he adds those who remain silent, fail to prevent it, and fail to report it—mutus, non obstans, non manifestans—provided they had an obligation to speak, to prevent, or to report. Everything hinges on that clause. Culpable omission is not any inactivity, but failing to do a good that was owed when one could and should have done it. That precision prevents two injustices. The first would be to declare every reader guilty of another person's crime: guilt is not distributed equally, and the prosecutor, the expert, the judge, and the neighbor bear duties of very different weight. The second would be to use that truth to declare oneself exempt from everything. I cannot perform a genetic identification, but I can ask why it is not being performed. I cannot search for all of Mexico's disappeared. I can prevent them from disappearing from my memory and my judgment.
We have never known so much about distant suffering, and never had such a convenient gesture for making it disappear. The grave shares a screen with a restaurant and a funny dog; it is not that we do not know, but that we know for fifteen seconds. The strange thing is that this same country can, when it chooses, sustain its attention for days on end.
VI. The Raised Fist
In September 1985, and again in September 2017, when the city collapsed, strangers formed chains to pass stones from hand to hand; students organized rescue teams before the authorities did, doctors ran to help, kitchens sprang up on sidewalks. And there was a gesture the national memory holds as it holds few others: someone raises a fist and hundreds fall silent, because beneath the rubble a person may still be breathing. No one asks his party or his surname. There is someone down there. That is enough.
Why do we know how to fall silent to hear a stranger beneath a concrete slab, yet have not known how to form an equally stubborn chain to bring our disappeared out of the anonymity of the graves? I suspect the answer is uncomfortable. The earthquake grants us an immediate innocence: the enemy is the earth, and the earth has no accomplices. A grave forces us to look within the city. These are two silences that resemble each other only in form: one is silent in order to listen; the other is silent in order not to have heard. And the second would not be possible if those whose duty it is to break it first had broken it.
VII. What Power Exists For
In few countries is the word people uttered so often by those in power as in Mexico in these years: every morning. There is no need to mock it; there is a need to take it seriously. If people means more than a source of legitimacy, these children—if the expert examination confirms they were children—were also the people, its most defenseless portion: a people that did not yet vote, did not fill public squares, could neither applaud its ruler nor punish him at the ballot box. Protection was owed to them not because they were the people, but because they were human and innocent; yet whoever invokes the people every morning cannot forget that they too belonged to it. A community demonstrates how much it loves the people not by how often it names them, but by how it treats the portion of the people that can give it nothing in return.
The tradition that nourishes these pages has never understood the political community as a sum of wills that occasionally produce a majority. Danilo Castellano has insisted that politics has a nature and an end, and that the common good is neither a negotiated project nor a sum of interests, but the good of every human being as a human being, common precisely because it suits everyone by nature. Miguel Ayuso has shown the emptiness of a legal order reduced to form when power and law become detached from justice. And Jean-Michel Gleize reminds us that the city exists to procure for man what he needs to perfect himself and to establish the order of justice in which the temporal common good consists, which is not man's final end, but a step toward Him to whom, ultimately, everything is owed.
Put without scholastic language: power does not exist to contemplate itself functioning. There may be open offices, budgets spent, and daily press conferences, and yet a concrete failure toward the person who should have been protected. The question is not technical. It is this: did the government and its institutions fail this child? A child does not need the government to meet a statistic; he needs to reach adulthood alive. His mother does not need to know what score the prosecutor's office received in an international index; she needs them to search for her son and, if he has died, for someone to tell her where he is. The government and its institutions fail—this government or any previous one, for in this matter no one arrives with clean hands—every time they can and should sustain the order of justice but leave the innocent at the mercy of the strong. No policy of cash transfers supplies that duty, because justice begins before income: it begins with a child's being able to exist without becoming prey.
International law occupies a secondary place here: it sometimes coincides with what is just, but it is neither its source nor its measure. Even so, its bodies have spoken with a clarity that ought to suffice. In May, the Inter-American Commission put the number of disappeared people in the country at more than one hundred and twenty-eight thousand, more than eighteen thousand of them minors, and although it found no evidence of a government strategy to disappear people, it described structural impunity. In April, for the first time in its history, the United Nations Committee on Enforced Disappearances found reasonable grounds to indicate that enforced disappearances committed in Mexico constituted crimes against humanity, and asked for the matter to be brought before the General Assembly, which is expected to examine it this fall. That decision does not establish anything about Zacapu. It is enough to prevent the allegation from being dismissed as social-media excess.
VIII. What Is Owed
I am not asking for indignation. Indignation is an unstable emotion and, in our time, a commodity: it produces one day of fury and the following morning seeks another object. What is needed is a virtue, and the first is justice. The child was owed protection. The disappeared person, a search. The dead, identification and burial. The family, truth. The guilty, a fair trial. The community, the order that was violated.
In Zacapu that has a precise and unliterary meaning: independent specialists must inventory the pieces, determine which are human and which belong to children, establish how many individuals they represent, reconstruct their chain of custody, attempt to recover DNA, and compare the results with missing-person records. And if part of the public account proves false, that too must be stated without reservation. A just cause does not need lies. Truth is not the enemy of the victims: it is the first thing they are owed.
This is not a concession by charity to justice, but its consequence. Charity, which loves God above all things and one's neighbor for His sake, is the form of the virtues because it orders their acts toward the ultimate end; thus it must not be confused with tenderness without truth or the embrace that replaces the judge. Gleize warns that false mercy, the kind that dissolves the order of justice, contradicts the good it claims to seek. Charity desires the true good of the innocent, and therefore will not tolerate what was done to him becoming a matter of indifference. It also desires the true good of the guilty, and therefore denies him neither a just punishment nor the possibility of conversion. Faced with a possible grave of children, charity does not say how sad. It says: search, identify, return, judge. And those saying it today, shovel in hand, are not those who ought to be saying it.
IX. Mothers with Shovels
The mothers searching for the disappeared refute our alibis one by one. They know nothing of the diffusion of responsibility: they do not say someone else will search. They do not know helplessness as an excuse: they do not say, since I cannot solve everything, I will do nothing. They do not allow a figure to become an abstraction. We turn people into statistics; they restore statistics to the condition of people.
Their figure also embodies a reversal of order. The Inter-American Commission recorded it with administrative dryness: the burden of investigation has shifted to the families. The woman who should be helped helps the institutions. The woman who lost her child learns forensic anthropology. The woman who should be mourning stands, shovel in hand, on a property where others burned bodies. Public power should look upon them not with ceremonial gratitude but with institutional shame, because each uses her shovel to ask a question no press release can silence: why am I doing the very thing you exist to do?
But that question is not addressed only to them. Sooner or later, it rebounds upon us.
X. The Third Disappearance
There is a primitive stage of evil in which it needs to hide: the murderer conceals the body, the corrupt official the document, the accomplice the connection. And there is another, more advanced and more fearsome, in which it discovers that it no longer needs to hide completely. Repetition is enough. One grave, another grave; one mother, another mother; one official promise, another anniversary. What would have been unbearable happening once becomes part of the landscape when it happens a hundred times.
Classical morality knows the mechanism better than statistics: repeated acts engender habits, and vice darkens reason until it corrupts its judgment of good and evil. Psychology calls it desensitization. Tradition has a sterner word: hardening. The hardened man does not need to think the crime is good; he needs only for it not to interrupt his dinner.
The jurist is careful with words here. Terror and terrorism are not synonyms, and the available information about Zacapu does not establish the means and ends that criminal law requires for the latter. But there is something the code does not define and life does. A society in which disappearance becomes an ordinary possibility reorganizes its existence around fear: it changes routes and schedules, learns whom not to speak about, learns what it is best not to know. The criminal then gains a victory greater than the proceeds of his crime: through fear, he governs part of other people's conduct. And the community begins to obey an authority that was never legitimate, while the constituted authority drafts press releases.
That is the third disappearance. It happens neither on a property nor in a morgue, but within us. First they wanted to make the child disappear. Then his body and his name. We complete the work when we allow the outrage to disappear as well. Of the three, it is the only one we can still prevent. That is why it is the only one for which we are entirely responsible.
XI. The Daily Mirror
López Velarde asked the homeland: “always be the same, faithful to your daily mirror.” The plea admits today a reading the poet did not imagine. A nation faithful to its daily mirror would also have to look at itself in Zacapu's disturbed earth, and not avert its eyes when the image returns what it does not want to see.
I return to the women and their sieve. Every sieve is, at heart, a theory of what matters: it lets through what is not sought and retains what is. They tightened the mesh until even the smallest thing could not escape. Perhaps at the end of a rigorous expert examination there will be fewer teeth; perhaps the truth will require counting more. Let science reduce the figure if it must, and multiply it if the evidence demands it. What cannot happen is for it to slip once again through the fingers of a country that already knows.
The teeth cannot speak. The question Zacapu asks Mexico is not how many fitted into those mothers' sieve.
It is how wide the mesh of our own has become.
Note on Sources and Method
The current state of the Zacapu question was reconstructed from the public statements of the collective Buscando Cuerpos en Todo México, the statement issued by the Michoacán state prosecutor's office and the statements of its deputy prosecutor, as well as the federal prosecutor's office statement of September 18, 2026, as reported by the national press between September 18 and 30, 2026. Every figure relating to the discovery is attributed to the collective; none is presented as an expert finding. “Second” and “third disappearance” are used as moral categories, not as statutory offenses.
Doctrinal sources: Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, I–II, q. 51, a. 2 and q. 85, a. 3; II–II, q. 23, a. 8; q. 58, a. 1; q. 62, a. 7; q. 79, a. 3. The Greater Catechism of Saint Pius X, on sins that cry to heaven. Danilo Castellano, La naturaleza de la política. Miguel Ayuso, El Estado en su laberinto. Las transformaciones de la política contemporánea. Jean-Michel Gleize, studies on the common good, justice, and mercy in Courrier de Rome. Ramón López Velarde, “La suave Patria” (1921).
Empirical and legal sources: D. Västfjäll, P. Slovic et al., “Compassion Fade: Affect and Charity Are Greatest for a Single Child in Need,” PLoS ONE (2014); M. Spranca, E. Minsk and J. Baron, “Omission and Commission in Judgment and Choice,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27 (1991); J. Darley and B. Latané, “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 (1968). Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Desaparición de personas en México (May 11, 2026). Committee on Enforced Disappearances, Decision under Article 34 of the Convention: Mexico (April 2, 2026).
Documentary Record
The displayed signature is standardized as Lic. Oscar Méndez O. The source’s variant is retained as a record of provenance.
View the Original Publication →You May Also Enjoy
Comments
Post a Comment